It would be great if there was such a platform, an applicati

· The Verdict ·

“An unfinished sentence is not a pitch — there's no product here.”

— Garry Tan

Lead reviewer

Strengths

Interest-based communities have demonstrated real retention in some verticals
Cross-border professional connection is a genuine unmet need in some niches

Concerns

Pitch is literally incomplete — cuts off mid-sentence with no product spec
No wedge: 'people with shared interests' describes Reddit, Discord, LinkedIn, and 50 others
Zero founder signal — no expertise, no scar tissue, no unfair access to any of these user groups
No answer to why this wins against incumbents with existing supply and demand already locked in

Reasoning

The business mechanics here are non-existent because the submission isn't finished. Even if it were, 'social network for people with common interests' is the most-attempted and least-differentiated category in consumer tech. The wedge would need to be brutally specific — one trade, one geography, one workflow — not 'builders AND mechanics AND programmers AND drivers.' That list signals the founder hasn't done the hard work of picking a beachhead they can actually dominate.

Other judges

Gary Vee

Attention & distribution

02/10

“Interests-based social hasn't been unbuilt — it's just been ignored for a reason.”

Strengths

Cross-border niche communities have real unmet hunger
Builders and mechanics are underserved by mainstream platforms

Concerns

No attention thesis whatsoever — zero channel thinking
Pitch trails off mid-sentence, no founder conviction visible
This is a wish, not a go-to-market strategy
Facebook Groups, Reddit, Discord already own this exact territory

▸ Read reasoning

Look — 'it would be great if' is the most dangerous phrase in startups because it signals a product daydream, not a distribution war plan. You've named a crowded space — interest-based community — without telling me why anyone hears about yours first, who the face is, or what channel you're going to bleed on for five years. The pitch literally doesn't finish. That's not a detail problem, that's a conviction problem.

Tony Robbins

Conviction & standards

02/10

“Wishing for a platform is not the same as being called to build one.”

Strengths

Broad cross-industry vision suggests some curiosity about connection
Interest-based community angle touches real human need for belonging

Concerns

Pitch opens with 'it would be great if' — a spectator's phrase, not a builder's
No personal stake visible; founder could be anyone who has used the internet
Zero sign of obsession, lived pain, or why THIS founder must solve THIS
The sentence trails off mid-thought — standards start at the pitch level

▸ Read reasoning

The phrase 'it would be great if' is the most revealing signal in this entire submission — it places the founder outside the problem, dreaming at it, not inside it, burning from it. There is no identity match here, no evidence of a standard being set, no indication this person has lost sleep over the gap they're describing. What's your why? Because without it, this idea is just a wish, and wishes don't survive the first hard month.

Original pitch

It would be great if there was such a platform, an application where people could communicate by interests, where builders from different countries, auto mechanics, programmers, drivers sit

Path

·
Submitted
·
Scored
·
Greenlit
·
Building
5
Live

Comments0

Pitch anotherLeaderboard